https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147774
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|CROSS REFERENCE TO HEADING: |CROSS REFERENCE TO HEADING: |There should be an option |Need option to drop the |to drop the separator in |final number separator in |reference text |reference text --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) First, my apologies for not being able to make the design meeting yesterday, for the agenda item regarding this issue. Try as I might, I have many things going on in my life, and that's besides my day job, so... even if I know a meeting is upcoming I can usually not make it. Anyway, I agree that > I don't think we get a final clarification by renaming. But that point is moot, because the "Number" and "Chapter" entries in the refer-by dialog now have two differences. But none of the distinctions between the two are properly served by the current names. And again, that's not the point of this bug. > To understand the > idea behind "full number" and "number without final separator" you need to > know this discussion. Ultimately it's a piece of cake to pick the right > option by trial and error. Ah, no. It is _impossible_ to pick the right option, because once there are two semantic differences between the items, LO is only offering two of the four possible options: * Containing header ("chapter") number, with final separator * Containing header ("chapter") number, without final separator * Paragraph's number, with final separator * Paragraph's number, without final separator > For bug 142555 I believe we have to resolve it as WF. Both chapter and > number are needed. And so are with and without final separator options. But like I've already written - even that is not enough. Because the with/without final separator is necessary also for "Number (no context)" and "Number (full context)". Which is why a toggle, separate from the list box, is necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
