https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148275
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #4) > Why not keep things simple and if any --convert-to operation fails call > std::exit with EXIT_FAILURE rather than EXIT_SUCCESS. If that's an option - then great! Do you mean "std::exit after the first failure"? How a user would know if some previous ones succeeded? I suppose that EXIT_FAILURE is more about inability to run. But having another dedicated value for the case would likely make it simple enough, and still distinguishable? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
