https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148764
--- Comment #1 from andreas_k <[email protected]> --- +1 for update the icon packaging. about the licence and other information stuff, we can use the "packaging" of our extensions. There most stuff should be already available like maintainer, license, ... description. All icon themes within LibO core area available as svg files AND were done first as svg file (inkscape). So the png files (which was used by LibO) are only renderd from the svg files. Light / Dark ------------ The colibre icon theme was done for light and dark. Dark icons are NOT ONLY use other colors. Most icons are black -> white but there are icons which are different like you see a sun on insertgraphic and a moon in dark mode. Be aware of this. png --- since 6.4 I wait for native svg icon theme support that look good. We are all for svg icon theme support, but the quality is now bad. package ------- from my point of view it's enough that the complete package has one license so no need for file specific informations. sc_ lc_ ------- it's ok(isch) that libreoffice icons didn't use freedesktop icon names, but it would be nice if it does. What is a pain are the prefix sc_ for 16px and lc_ for 24px icon sizes. the 32px icons already have a separate folder. It would be nice if the sc_ and lc_ files will also get there separtae folder. about folders. I didn't know why there are cmd, sw, sd, ... folders. from a designer point of view ALL icons could be in one folder depend on the size. Like we know from gnome/kde, ... icon themes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
