https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148790
Telesto <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Telesto <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > The topic was on the agenda of the design meeting. > > The No List function was added with > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/108841 for bug 92622 and bug 115965. > Some good arguments in these tickets. > > We could remove it from the toolbar > sw/uiconfig/swriter/toolbar/textobjectbar.xml, or just hide it. A) Removing No List from the toolbar would remove my 'sting' B) In principle the 'No list' is wrong. There is no Disable No-List feature. the no List being 'enabled' by default (but does nothing). And the possibility to disable a list, by clicking the button again (no list has no value). However I do get the issue at bug 115965. Unordered list/Unordered list are mutual exclusive. Radio button focus on the mutual exclusiveness. Checkbox focuses on the on/off aspect (toggle ordered list on, click again to disable) >From the logic checkbox system makes more sense compared to radio buttons. By clicking 'ordered list' a second time you do know you're disabling an ordered list (and not an unordered list). Which seems relevant to visual impaired too, but what do I know... But well I do grasp the surprise, if you hear checkbox the first time :-), with unordered/and ordered list being mutual exclusive Dependent checkbox are pretty common. See Format -> Paragraph -> Text Flow. 'Do Not split Paragraph' enables if you disable Orphan and Window Control With Page Style enables if 'Insert (breaks) being checked. Note: when I say I'm in principle against, doesn't mean there can be exceptions.. I'm undecided if this is such a case.. I do struggle.. I'm already happy with removal from toolbar. However this does hit the fundamental question how much of the UI (and logic) must be bend. And where the need for an dedicated UI begins. -- Adding CC to Mike for his opinion.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
