https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148455
--- Comment #12 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 179942 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=179942&action=edit Attachment 179787in Word 2013 and the original attachment 179687 in Writer I see that the numbering is restarted correctly in Word 2013. Very strange. Another issue is the two dots appearing before the numbering letter. This started in: https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/9987b518fca1476bd0ce8c86bcf6ac7c81f7b580 author Vasily Melenchuk <[email protected]> Mon Jun 14 14:27:56 2021 +0300 committer Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]> Tue Jun 29 19:02:20 2021 +0200 new ODF numbered list parameter loext:num-list-format After this the two extra dots appeared in the odt attachment 179687 file as well until: https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/bf2b46aa15665dde63ceff4e7686b99b3990354f author Vasily Melenchuk <[email protected]> Sun Dec 26 20:38:30 2021 +0300 committer Vasily Melenchuk <[email protected]> Mon Dec 27 15:47:21 2021 +0100 tree 765ac9ce801e742d2d6f4dd56640e4a5bd53a48f parent bbfce0b49fb11997af8eb03d40431b6a78f2aebe [diff] tdf#146257: sw: better handling for list numbering = NONE The docx export when opened in Word (not in Writer!) is still affected in a fresh nightly: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: fe61ab648e0f3b5993660f2255aca2de6f53c2a2 CPU threads: 14; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: default; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (hu_HU); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Jumbo BUT this is a completely different issue of what the OP claimed. It would be better to file this separately. Also .doc export of your odt attachment 179687 is bad: the last paragraph continues the original numbering, so "a b c a b" becomes "a b c a d". In Word there are two extra dots before the letters. RTF export is again differently bad: restart numbering is completely lost. In Word there are two extra dots before the letters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
