https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60882

--- Comment #9 from Christophe Strobbe <[email protected]> ---
I looked at this with LibreOffice 7.1.4.2:
Version: 7.1.4.2 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 10(Build:2)
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.5; UI render: default; VCL: kf5
Locale: en-GB (en_GB.utf8); UI: en-GB
Calc: threaded

In isaric's original ODF file, the list below Point A is formatted using a
Footnote style, which is not to be recommended.

LibreOffice currently behaves as follows:

1. When you create a bulleted list using the "Bulleted List" button on the
formatting toolbar, LibreOffice generates a <text:list> element for the list
and one <text:list-item> for each list item in the ODF's XML code. This results
in <ul> element with <li> elements, both when saving as HTML and when exporting
to XHTML. This works in the way it should.
2. When you create a list using only the List 1 style, for example, and don't
define a numbering style, LibreOffice generates one <text:p> element per list
item, i.e. there is no list structure in the ODF's XML code. This is probably
why no ul elements are created when saving as HTML or exporting as XHTML. 
3. When you create a list using only the List 1 style, for example, and then
either edit the style to define a list style or select the entire list and
press the "Bulleted List" button, LibreOffice generates <text:list> element for
the list and one <text:list-item> for each list item in the ODF's XML code.
This results in <ul> element with <li> elements, both when saving as HTML and
when exporting to XHTML. This works in the way it should.

I doubt that LibreOffice's behaviour in the second case (no <text:list>
element) is correct. However, most authors will apply a list style to their
lists and thereby also get correct bullet lists in the exported HTML and XHTML.

Based on this, I think we can focus this issue on just spacing of the
footnotes? (That would mean we should retitle this bug again.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to