https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140617
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff | |ice.org --- Comment #4 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- It seems PAC 3 here is behaving in a silly way and it would be harmful to uncritically follow its advice. See this for one discussion: https://community.adobe.com/t5/acrobat-discussions/alternative-description-missing-for-annotation-table-of-contents/m-p/10217239 Please think of the value that implementing this request would provide. To comply with PAC 3's demands, LibreOffice would have to duplicate the link text by default in the alternative description. It would just be redundant data. World Wide Web Consortium writes: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/PDF13.html "The objective of this technique is to provide replacement link text via the /Alt entry in the property list for a tag. This is usually not necessary, but in some situations, additional information beyond the visible link text is needed, particularly for screen reader users." Pay attention to "usually not necessary". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
