https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149500
raal <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected Regression By| |Michael Stahl --- Comment #3 from raal <[email protected]> --- This seems to have begun at the below commit. Adding Cc: to Michael Stahl; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks bibisect-50max 3551e5dfdb75ecca07f759422bda10d3a7117489 is the first bad commit commit 3551e5dfdb75ecca07f759422bda10d3a7117489 Author: Matthew Francis <[email protected]> Date: Wed May 27 21:08:00 2015 +0800 source-hash-b24a15a0aaea310806259eaa20a7d509ce30e5c8 commit b24a15a0aaea310806259eaa20a7d509ce30e5c8 Author: Michael Stahl <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu Apr 2 23:33:41 2015 +0200 Commit: Michael Stahl <[email protected]> CommitDate: Thu Apr 2 23:53:30 2015 +0200 sw: fix crash on SwUndoDelete after select-all with table at start Somehow the Redo leaves the shell cursor at an invalid offset into the paragraph, which then leads to out-of-bounds string access. Noticed that SwUndRng::SetPaM() leaves an invalid nContent.m_nIndex on the start position, due to a surprising omission in SwIndex::ChgValue(). (regression from 555ff26501d1bbd8a7872c20671c6303db1e1701) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
