https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149332

--- Comment #15 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Francesco from comment #14)
> but I see we both would waste time
> discussing about something that has already been decided and won't be
> changed.

No, the discussion documents why the decision is taken, and thus it may be
challenged later with better arguments.

Thus:

> it's the same for every feature in any program: for
> example there is a feature that makes text bold and can be inadvertently
> changed. But since it's visible, the same user can disable if not needed,
> and anyway (s)he learned how to make text bold (if we suppose this option
> was not known by that user).

This is *not* the same. When user presses a Bold button, the effect is
immediately obvious, thus toggling back is easy, and also learning what they
did.

In the discussed case, the function is not immediately visible, until you start
typing in another language (and it's not granted that it will happen the same
day, or even month). So the action will likely *not* result in "(s)he learned
how to", and when they see the effects much later, they will have no clue why.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to