https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129167

--- Comment #16 from Roland Hughes <rol...@logikalsolutions.com> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #15)
> (In reply to Roland Hughes from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #12)
> > > > This isn't really a duplicate of bug 112740
> > > > though it has been marked as such.
> > > 
> > > Yes it is. It asks to restore position in DOCX, as it does for ODT 
> > > (comment
> > > 3). What you write in comment 11 (and in bug 112740 comment 6) is a
> > > *different* feature request - please file it separately. Thank you.
> > 
> > No, it's not a *different* feature.
> 
> It *is*. Just because you mentioned that you know that you want to have for
> MS formats what is *already available* for odt. And for odt, the last
> position is stored in the document. And the only way to have the *same*
> feature in an external format is to follow that format's creator convention.

No, it's not the **only** way. I've written software for 30 (almost 40) years.
Believing that there will be only a single editor of a document in 2022 and
storing last position in the document itself isn't the **only** way, in fact it
is a really bad way because last one in wins.

> implemented, it doesn't make the feature that Justin is implementing
> "short-sighted" other than the short-sightedness of those who don't
> appreciate implementation of others' needed features. 

I fully understand "others' needed features." My software goes into medical
devices and has for the past 10 years or so. In all honesty I hope to never
have to have any of them used on me, not because I doubt my work, I just don't
ever want to be sick enough to need a patient monitor, infusion pump, etc.

Implementing "last one in wins" is short sighted and an architectural flaw. In
today's world, especially the business world, there will be at least two,
usually around six, people who work on any given document. They will all want
their environment to come up to the last place they were.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to