https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84973
--- Comment #17 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #16) > If you have strong arguments to keep the behavior we should consider a > different name for the variable. Something like "Date (at time of > creation)". Sounds terrible, though. The fixed date *field* is created *specifically* to be set at the moment when the document was created from a template. It makes *very* little sense to use it otherwise - you can instead just type a fixed date string, like what happens in Calc when you use Insert->Date. The whole point of the field is that. So if you want to change it for "Open Copy", that *by no means* can change this behavior of *templates*. You actually introduce a third way of opening a document - not from its file, nor using a template, but using another document "almost as template, but not exactly for the sake of fixed fields". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
