https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149859
Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All
Version|7.3.2.2 release |Inherited From OOo
OS|Windows (All) |All
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #3)
I'd suggest to discuss before WFing.
I doubt it related to the initial file name - and the title metadata of the
document does not get to the filenames proposed in the Save As dialog. Then: do
users really need the *template name* as the filename suggestion? Do you expect
your file named "Landscape" or "Blue and Red Gradient", just because such a
template was used to create it? How could it relate to the document identity?
I also doubt that it is related to epub work - it was implemented for 6.0 [1],
while the discussed behavior is also present in OOo 3.2.0.
So the question is - if there is *any* justification in this behavior at all? I
mean, other than "nobody knows, and nobody cares to drop it".
Possibly debugging and checking relevant code commit history could shed some
light.
[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/6.0#New_filters
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
