https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150001
--- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 181307 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=181307&action=edit The formula in Word 2016 It is definitely a compatibility issue. Just wanted to note that it's astonishing how the formula could get created in Word. The attachment shows the cursor set in the beginning of the formula; one may see which block is highlighted - it's "Ce(NO", which is not a reasonable formula block, including an opening parenthesis and an incomplete inner subexpression. This corresponds to the XML: > <m:sSub> > ... > <m:e> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>Ce(NO</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:e> > <m:sub> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>3</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:sub> > </m:sSub> > <m:sSub> > ... > <m:e> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>)</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:e> > <m:sub> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>3</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:sub> > </m:sSub> And to the import result in Math: > {Ce(NO} rsub {3} {)} rsub {3} ... where all the parts in braces: "{Ce(NO}", "{3}", "{)}", and "{3}" correspond to the separate <m:sub> elements of the original formula. I wonder how can that be ever converted into a valid math expression, given the input - unless we treat every piece of such a "formula" as literal text, which would ruin all normal formulas. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
