https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133295
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eike Rathke from bug 127831 comment #19) > Given how OFFSET() and INDIRECT() work a non-volatile version doesn't make > sense. Eike: is it possible to add a way for a function implementation to add some range(s) to their dependency list explicitly, so that not only the direct references that parser may resolve are taken into account at "set dirty" stage, but also this explicit list? That could enable implementation of OFFSET.NV / INDIRECT.NV variants, hopefully without a drawback of having stale values there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
