https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43157

--- Comment #121 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #120)

I believe it's still easyhack, with rather trivial difficulty - just needs some
guidelines.
E.g., there's lots of 'OSL_ENSURE(false, ...)' stuff in things like catch
clauses; I don't see how replacing those could be non-trivial. Thus, I
suggested to make it easyhack again, with rather low difficulty - and if
needed, new, more focused easyhacks could be created instead.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to