https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149824

--- Comment #12 from Amin <mozaffar.a...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #9)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #8)
> > Hello Amin,
> > 
> > Unfortunately, your opening comment and your attachment "current and
> > expected situation" - contradict.
> > 
> > In your opening comment, you've listed the "expected results" to the
> > ordering of numbers that in your attachment is described as
> > inappropriate/undesirable. You've also stated that's not what you get in LO.
> > 
> > Well, I'll assume that you mixed up "expected" and "actual" in the first
> > comment.
> > 
> > Assuming that is the case, then - this is NOTABUG.
> > 
> > Numbers, in both Arabic and Hebrew (and most probably Farsi) are written
> > from left-to-write, starting with the most significant decimal digit. They
> > are _mostly_ read that way - with the exception that, in Arabic, the last
> > two digits are read in reverse order. Anyway, 502 would be written, in
> > Arabic with hindi digits as ٥٠٢ - both in an RTL and an LTR paragraph. Also,
> > when writing a fractional number, the integral part is to the left of the
> > fractional part.
> > 
> > It thus makes sense for Number-Dot-Number paragraph numbering, in Arabic as
> > well as in English, to have the first number on the left, and the second
> > number on the right. Hundreds of Thousands of Arabic speakers use
> > LibreOffice, and - to my knowledge - have not complained about this being
> > the order.
> > 
> > As for your ODT attachment #181202 [details] - when I open it, I see Arabic,
> > not Hindi,  numerals in both sequences of paragraphs (i.e. 123, not ١٢٣).
> > You should probably choose an explicit number sequence rather than sticking
> > to the default.
> > 
> > So, please clarify and update the attachments if necessary.
> 
> Numbered lists (in Arabic at least) follow the hierarchical order not the
> LTR direction of the numbers, so 1 must precede 2 (i.e. be at the right of
> it).
> 
> One possible solution is to surround each level number with FSI (U+2068) /
> PDI (U+2069) so they becomes isolated from each other and follow the
> paragraph direction.

Yes. I agree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to