https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150276
--- Comment #21 from Regina Henschel <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 181849 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=181849&action=edit rotated parts including line break The situation in Word is different from LibreOffice: (1) Word treats the rotated part as one character. That is, after the part is rotated you cannot move the cursor into this part to edit it. In LibreOffice you can move the cursor into a rotated part to edit it. (2) If a rotated part is the last "character" in a line in Word, the cursor will be after the part when moving the cursor forward. In LibreOffice the cursor will jump to the next line after leaving the rotated part. (3) The UI of Word does not allow any kind of line break inside a rotated part. In LibreOffice it is possible to have a 'shift+enter' inside the rotated text. In that case the rotated part still belong to the same line. If such odt-file is opened in Word, Word divides the rotated parts and generates two lines from it. The problem is that a <text:line-break> element is indeed allowed inside a <text:span> element and therefore the current treatment in LibreOffice is OK in regard to ODF. The current rendering of the pilcrow sign overlapping the rotated part is wrong in any case. My take is, that a cursor movement should place the cursor after the rotated part after leaving the rotated part and only the next moving step forward should move the cursor to the next line. Such the pilcrow sign would be always in main orientation and after the rotated part. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
