https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150877

--- Comment #3 from Eike Rathke <[email protected]> ---
These two cases are rightfully commented out. My short investigation shows we
don't have conversions for them, at least there's no RTL_TEXTENCODING_IBM_620
define, the only 620 is RTL_TEXTENCODING_TIS_620 which is Thai that doesn't fit
Polish ;-)  Same for CP859 there's no RTL_TEXTENCODING_IBM_859.

Code pointers:
include/rtl/textenc.h
sal/textenc/tencinfo.cxx
and look for all places over the code base that use for example
RTL_TEXTENCODING_IBM_865 to see what would need to be added to support a new
encoding.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to