https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127331
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] --- Bug 151151(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #0) > Workaround: > - Go to the Navigator. > - Open the 'Drawing objects' tree. > - Double-click at the first 'PowerPlusWaterMarkObject'. Now the watermark is > selected in the page. > - Go to menu Format > Wrap > In background and deselect this item. There > should be no check mark. > - Go to menu Format > Arrange > Bring to Front. > Now the watermark is in front of the pictures. This work-around doesn't work with the current version of LO (7.4.1.2) anymore. However, it brings a lot of bugs to the surface. I created Bug #151151 to show the ones I found (all together seven of them). All these issues could be avoided with a solution like @Heiko also proposed in Comment #9. The only difference is that I would implement the UI with a pair of radiobuttons rather than a checkbox because it makes it easier to compare the result of the two settings. Regarding the discussion whether the watermark should be in front of everything or behind everything, I think it should work like a "CONFIDENTIAL" stamp on documents. It should cover everything. I cannot see any advantage of the other way but seemingly there are others who can. That's why I believe it should be adjustable in a straightforward way. Note: I am opened to see a real world example why it can be useful. The wikipedia page of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watermark says stamp (overprint) is also a watermark: > The word is also used for digital practices that share similarities with > physical > watermarks. In one case, overprint on computer-printed output may be used to > identify > output from an unlicensed trial version of a program. In another instance, > identifying > codes can be encoded as a digital watermark for a music, video, picture, or > other file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
