https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151166
--- Comment #6 from osnola <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 182703 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=182703&action=edit Numbers address documentation (In reply to SheetJS from comment #5) > > Laurent: There is a semi-related issue > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150782 . Seeing some of > the names like `IWORKFormula::Address`, is this the right place / time to > change 194 to "DURATION" and 212 to something different? I'm not sure why I wrote `IWORKFormula::Address`; maybe because I thought this function is different from the Address function of odf, but I'm not sure if this is true ( see attachment ). Otherwise yes, this function creates the result that will be returned to librevenge, so we can change the name of the functions or make special cases: for instance, if the function is "toto" and it has two parameters, return instead of toto(stack_1,stack_2): toto(tuto(stack_2), stack_1, 1) with some work. Note: - the format of iWorks files has changed over time, at first the files were compressed xml files ( and the formulas were strings, in this case IworkFormula::parse is called to convert such string into the structure wanted by librevenge). Now it uses a binary format, we just have to switch from a suffix notation to the usual notation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
