https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138805
--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Potts from comment #3) > Per the request for more information: I wasn't so much reporting a bug as > suggesting that the methodology for LO's labels -- unlike SO MUCH of the > rest of this VERY EXCELLENT suite -- is needlessly complex and impossible to > explain to a normal clerical worker. I have my own How2 cheat sheet that > contains 21 steps! I stand by my original comment: > " TAKE A LOOK AT WORD PERFECT FOR THE WAY IT OUGHT TO WORK. " > I am unaware of any further "information or data" that I can provide, but > as a lover of the LO program and ideal, I would be happy to correspond with > any human addressing this needlessly complex method. Sure, I was human in April this year and I'm still human :) What I'm saying is that at the moment your report is not actionable as it is too vague, while we already have dozens of reports about labels. Of course it would be a bit tedious for you to review the existing reports, but I think you are the only one who could correlate them with what you have in mind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
