https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148410
Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |samuel.mehrbrodt@allotropia | |.de, [email protected] --- Comment #7 from Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Timur from comment #5) > author Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> 2020-11-19 > commit f39f21d92ec83c3a5062f29dd26214fc83012c06 > tdf#138010 (IV) VclScrolledWindow: Use actual border width > > So bibisect is here. Michael, please see this and previous comment. Odd, for me, the behavior with gtk3 and kf5 with the attached sample doc is pretty much the same. I still cannot reproduce what the screenshot in attachment 179336 shows with the new sample doc on Debian testing. However, I see an unexpected placement of the formula bar with the sample doc, also with gtk3, see attachment 182760 for a screenshot with Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 995d17697d1e46f66df67ca3132369d76caea29e CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded @Timur: Is this what you mean, s. screenshot? And for me, the behavior shown in this screenshot starts with this commit (bibisected using the 7.4 bibisect repo): commit d0cacf09a1105d89bf3df84b18623d790e3aeb82 Author: Samuel Mehrbrodt <[email protected]> Date: Wed Apr 27 11:45:04 2022 +0200 tdf#99708 Save formula bar height to document Note that for kf5, this was pretty reliably reproducible when starting kf5 in non-maximized mode (i.e. closing non-maximized, then starting anew, not necessarily when starting maximized and then unmaximizing). I can't reproduce what I see with the mentioned commit from the 7.1 bibisect repo: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: f39f21d92ec83c3a5062f29dd26214fc83012c06 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.19; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded @Timur: Which of the two behaviors did you see (initially described one or the one from my screnshot)? If it's the originally described one: What system were you testing on? @Samuel: Any thoughts on what's shown in my sceenshot? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
