https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151151
--- Comment #6 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > I don't see need to place the watermark in the foreground (nor we have > interactions for this). I think the need for foreground-watermark is clear. You can see stamp-over labels in several movies, indicating "CONFIDENTIAL", "INVALID", "TOP SECRET", "PREVIEW" and other classification of documents. Here are some samples: http://www.nottinghamremovals.co.uk/confidential-document-destruction/index.php https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/photo/document-stamped-with-the-word-confidential-royalty-free-image/93270326 https://www.dreamstime.com/top-secret-document-decreted-confidential-information-secret-text-classified-information-top-secret-document-decreted-confidential-image192576251 It would be nice to have a native tool for this in Writer and an advanced watermark functionality could do the job very well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
