https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152030
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > Isn't exactly this an example why the current safety mechanism should be > kept? No, this is not what the safety mechanism is for. The safety mechanism is intended to prevent making _changes_ to a generated table - because even though it has internal content, we want it to be considered as a single entity; and it gets re-rendered occasionally when we update, so we don't want to give the user the idea that they should edit the ToC/index themselves. There is no problem with deleting a generated table and we don't want to protect against that. The way this restriction is applied simply hinders the use of selection, deletion and overwrite mechanics. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
