https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152085
Ming Hua <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |106045 --- Comment #5 from Ming Hua <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #4) > Maybe we could clarify the CJK meta with more acronyms (e.g. "vertical" and > "TB"), so it is easier to find? Technically, "vertical layout" and "CJK" are two related but different areas. Without going into details, let me say that CJK is more about the specific languages/scripts used, and concerns both horizontal and vertical layouts. On the other hand, vertical layouts can be used for any text, and even 90-degree-rotated English text are sometimes discussed as "vertical" in LO context. We do have another meta bug 106045 which is about vertical layout, which I've added to the dependency list. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106045 [Bug 106045] [META] Vertical and rotated text direction issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
