https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125619
--- Comment #26 from b. <[email protected]> --- I'm actually not using Calc but came across an issue which remained me on the comments / notes problem. _Assume_ it could be something like 'loop in loop', 'nested loops', which work well when developed / tested / used with small datasets, but expose evil 'superlinear behaviour' reg. 'quadratic-' or 'exponential-explosion' with 'big data' above some threshold. Such may harm execution time ( recursions ) or mem-usage ( large tables ) or both. If someone knowing Calc's code finds such in it... - either avoiding nested loops, - if unavoidable work with binary search in sorted lists, - and or the proposals in https://answers.sap.com/questions/2497299/how-to-avoid-loop-inside-the-loop-.html , https://answers.sap.com/questions/546841/how-to-avoid-the-loop-inside-loop-.html , https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18014889/how-to-avoid-quadratic-computation-resulting-from-double-for-loop-when-computi , could evtl. help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
