https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136306
--- Comment #9 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> --- (In reply to László Németh from comment #8) 1) I do get that there is no ideal solution for the problem, especially rule-based methodology. 2) The next step will be to remove them from the suggestions, too. Oh, well work in progress: nice :-). 3) So the O-rule mentioned in bug 139319 comment 7 isn't involved? 4) The LibreOffice 4.2 suggestion often better, in the sense of not containing gibberish . The suggestion for: "bovnmatige"(Dutch) doesn't contain "boonmatige" (gibberish) using 4.2 LibreOffice 4.4.0.3 *does* suggest "boonmatige" (and all newer versions do) Same for the example at bug 139319. No suggestion "sprachgebundene, sprachgebunden" in 4.2. It's hard to say something sensible/generalized. LibreOffice 4.2 isn't consistently better. Sometimes it's better, sometimes same oddity today as before. Sometimes it's worse, compared today. Good in 7.6 bad in 4.2 opinipeilingen vacinatieprogramma Odd suggestions but no invented words/ gibberish with 7.6 as with 4.2 overengekomen gedetalleerde Gibberish with 7.6 not seen with 4.2 hoofdlettergevoligheid [gibberish: 'hoofdlettergelovigheid'] bvenmatig [gibberish: 'beenmatig' 'boenmatig' 'ovenmatig'] bovnmatige [gibberish: 'boonmatige'] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
