https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152605
--- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #5) > Yes, abbreviated "Chapter Numbering" label change of bug 107573 was a poor > decision, "Chapter and Outline Numbering" would have been better replacement > for "Outline Numbering" I disagree. I mean, it would have been a slight improvement, but adding the word "Chapters" is not the way to go: * "Heading and Outline Numbering" is the most, shall we say, explanatory and easy-to-understand - but rather long; * "Outline Numbering" and "Heading Numbering" each have their benefits, and none of them is perfect IMHO. I would be willing to live with any of them, so I'm ok with the change suggested here. * "Chapter Numbering" is entirely inappropriate, confusing and even silly, see my explanation in bug 141452. ... and the above goes for "XXX level" just as it does for "XXX numbering". sdc.blanco, please note that while bug 141452 asked for going back "Outline Numbering", that was only because that had been the previous name. I said I wouldn't mind it being "Heading Numbers" in bug 141452c26, at the bottom. So I would encourage you (and others) to reopen that bug and support it (perhaps changing the title to say Heading/Outline numbering). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
