https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152922

Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
                   |                            |7372
            Summary|Chart element transparency  |Area transparency gradient
                   |gradient set from dialog    |set from dialog does not
                   |does not work (but it does  |work (but it does from
                   |from sidebar)               |sidebar)
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
           Keywords|bibisectRequest             |bibisected, bisected
          Component|Chart                       |LibreOffice
      Regression By|                            |Tamás Zolnai

--- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
<[email protected]> ---
Turns out it affects all objects with coloured area, not just in charts.
I just tried with a simple rectangle shape, same result:

1. Open e.g. Writer
2. Insert > Shapes > Basic Shapes > Rectangle
3. Trace a rectangle
4. Right click > Area > Transparency > Gradient: no effect.

I also noticed the workaround that changing the transparency type in the
sidebar fixes the dialog issue _for that shape_. So to reproduce, make sure you
first try the Area dialog before using the sidebar. 

Bibisected to the following commit with the linux-64-6.3 repo:

commit  278a60fe7bd2254a7c09c9d32317ff4f2aab752f
author  Tamás Zolnai <[email protected]>       Thu Sep 05 15:47:27
2019 +0200
committer       Xisco Faulí <[email protected]>        Tue Sep 10
01:42:13 2019 +0200
tree    71f30cc3e65a50797aa4c0176ebdb18cf6df4105
parent  e0932464fd8dc19de4f2c25bf9ef0812d8c02a64
tdf#127372: PPTX: Shape's background transparency changes during RT
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78657

... which was fixing the regression in bug 127372.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to