https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Blocks| |108728 CC| |stephane.guillou@libreoffic | |e.org See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 | |2110 Summary|problem with vocabulary |"The dictionary is already |replenishment |full" when adding new word | |to dictionary --- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> --- I assume the string is "The dictionary is already full" in English. It is defined here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/editeng/editrids.hrc?r=f7f0f399#308 And it is only used here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/editeng/source/misc/unolingu.cxx?r=91fef4a4#738 This is triggered if the dictionary has 30,000 or more entries. Size is checked in DictionaryNeo::isFull() here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/linguistic/source/dicimp.cxx?r=3d236177#920 DIC_MAX_ENTRIES limit of 30,000 is defined here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/linguistic/source/dicimp.hxx?r=fd3888c6&fi=DIC_MAX_ENTRIES#33 Not sure why this hard limit. I don't see it documented: https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/shared/optionen/01010400.html Any reason for this hard 30,000 limit? Should this report be changed into a documentation issue? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108728 [Bug 108728] [META] Dictionaries bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
