https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152738

Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Regression By|                            |Noel Grandin
           Keywords|bibisectRequest             |bibisected, bisected
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
                   |                            |3223
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
            Summary|LO75RC1: Automatic          |LO75RC1: Automatic
                   |spell-check on macOS not    |spell-check not underlining
                   |underlining misspelled      |misspelled words; dialog
                   |words                       |doesn't use paragraph's
                   |                            |language
           Priority|medium                      |high

--- Comment #8 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
<[email protected]> ---
To bibisect, I had to first make sure that the extra dictionary was at the
right spot. I copied it from my 7.5 installation

/opt/libreoffice7.5/share/extensions/dict-fr

and pasted in the local bibisect repo:

[...]/linux-64-7.5/instdir/share/extensions/dict-fr

Bibisected with linux-64-7.5 repo to first bad commit
84e282373a120d0a41bb96378085b253e8568e97 which points to core commit:
commit  b484e5d9e0d22b794c2d1c73741191836158a4ad        [log]
author  Noel Grandin <[email protected]>    Sat Oct 08 07:54:48 2022 +0200
committer       Noel Grandin <[email protected]>     Sun Oct 09
19:16:29 2022 +0200
tree    a1f8d3d3c7d0d5a01284e400f4c9d6f5d5dba260
parent  ca1378b6552251743c92a19f9ce8b3833557b548 [diff]
use more SwPosition::Assign
part of the process of hiding the internals of SwPosition
Change-Id: I20842b90d0abb4435d6b06970c2545229268e5e8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/141097

Noel, can you please have a look?

Martin, regarding the underline issue: could you please check if it is at all
related to the zoom level you are using? See bug 153223. An annotated
screenshot of this aspect of the issue would be helpful.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to