https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152724
--- Comment #13 from ady <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Laurent Balland from comment #12) > ? is now fixed in master (see bug 118324) TY. > 0 was already treated I'd like to emphasize that combining "?0" was not working in 7.4.4.2 for ods. I understand that you worked on the "?" part for 7.6; my point is that saying "0 was already treated" might be confusing to users, since the combination of "0" with some of the other codes was not working. > 0 was already treated, and any "reasonable" format combining #, ? and 0 > should be preserved in ODF in integer and decimal part. Would you please be so kind and mention here some example of "unreasonable" combination of "#, ? and 0"? Not only it would help for testing (now and in future versions), but especially to be aware and to be able to provide such information to other users. > _x still needs an ODF extension. I accordingly modified the summary. Would this RFE be assigned to someone for that? I compared the following 2 versions with an .ods file: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d8e6b488ceaff7c88856ebcfcfec14d2d8cd7652 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (es_AR); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Version: 7.4.4.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 85569322deea74ec9134968a29af2df5663baa21 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: default; VCL: win Locale: en-US (es_AR); UI: en-US Calc: CL Steps and Results (in the same order as described here): With 7.4.4.2: Saved as: _-?0;-?0;_-?0;@ Opened as: [>0]" "#;[<0]-#;" "#;@ Then with 7.6.0.0.alpha0+... Saved as: _-?0;-?0;_-?0;@ Opened as: [>0]" "?0;[<0]-?0;" "?0;@ Then closed without saving, and opened it in 7.4.4.2: [>0]" "00;[<0]-00;" "00;@ Please note the double zeros in the last one. Whether this could generate problems with users sharing files between different versions of LO, IDK. Whether this can be avoided, IDK either. (On a side note, the ods file seemed to be opened slightly slower in the aforementioned 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ than in 7.4.4.2.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
