https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153506
ady <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #8 from ady <[email protected]> --- @ bwilderhoo Perhaps you don't realize that you are replying to a bug report, not to one specific person. You have 2 different persons replying in the bug report you opened. One closed the report, while the other gave you the benefit of the doubt. So, now that you re-opened the report, and with the additional detail I just wrote, please read carefully the complete reply before answering. (In reply to bwilderhoo from comment #7) > I have used this same kind of conditional formatting in Microsoft Excel and > it has worked as I described above. That means that you are assuming that the exact same syntax is used by LO too. This is an understandable assumption, but unfortunately it is not correct. > > relative sheet name references as described above. Note, the bug is in the > merge of rows during the copy sheet function. The original sheet works just > fine with the existing 2 lines using relative row references. New sheets > created as copies from the original should work the same as the original--- > but in this case they do not because of the bug. In comment 5 I asked you to supply a value and in which specific location you would introduce it in order to trigger the problem you see. If you think that more than one value is necessary, please describe them. Alternatively, please attach a new file with the problem already triggered. To be clear, I have the same suspicion as m.a.riosv. Let's see if bwilderhoo can reply with a relevant sample value(s) or equivalent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
