https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153653
--- Comment #4 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) Main motivation for OP is to make it easier (in help and tooltip) to explain the operation of the "button". Not expecting a "self-contained" solution (i.e., completely transparent / understandable w/o explanation), but still believe that improvements can be made to facilitate comprehension. > Default reverts any association between the selected Level and the paragraph > style. The default is "Content X" (although it's not added to the level like > "Level 1 [Contents 1]"). For TOC, it is Contents. For other indices, other PS are used (e.g., for User-defined: "User Index N" ; for Alphabetical: "Index N" ; ...) > We use Reset on the whole dialog. "Factory Setting" is correct but I see no > advantage over "Default", which is short and easy to read. The tooltip > "Reverts the associated paragraph style to the default setting" is fine. But if "default" ( = factory setting) as you say, then "default" gives an affordance (for TOC) for "Content X", not "default PS". From that perspective, the tooltip is misleading, because the current action of the button does not revert to "default setting" -- but to "default paragraph style"! Another (acceptable for me) solution is to remove the "Default" button. Reasons: 1. Default Paragraph Style is always shown as an option for assignment for all indices -- so if a user wanted this PS, it could be assigned, with the advantage that this assignment is shown explicitly in the UI, not simply blank. 2. No additional functionality or advantage is achieved (at present) with the "Default" button. (plus it creates an ambiguity when the left column is blank). 3. Simplifies the UI. Still think the best (most user-friendly) would be for Default to reset to "factory setting", otherwise "no button" seems better than current implementation (no matter what the button is called or how it appears). "User-friendly": because it is a one-step operation to reset a customised PS on the left side -- versus the current situation where it is necessary to first find and select the right PS on the right side (e.g., among 10 "Contents N" and make sure it matches the correct level on the left), and then a second action of clicking the "<" assign button. And while we are looking at this dialog -- maybe the "Assign" button should be moved down to the middle between the Levels and PS columns? No consequences for documentation, so I could file another ticket if this seems appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
