https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153813
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected], | |[email protected] See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 | |6523 Blocks| |129062 --- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Also confirming, With Skia Vulka or Skia raster libs rendering, using an increment value for the area gradient it is not as smooth as the "auto" checkbox achieves. Checked at each of 16, 32, 64, 128 and 256 level gradient. CPU GDI rendering, or with CPU HA those gradient steps increase in smoothness through 256 increments, matching the "automatic" at about 128 steps. The Skia based rendering of the gradient steps also increase--but they do not smooth out. So at 256 steps, still noticeable moiré and coarseness to the gradient. Did similar for https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/a46cb5dc607d1d1af402ff3e8fce731e7427854d%5E%21 for bug 137523 for the liner gradients need to be done for radial area gradients? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129062 [Bug 129062] [META] Skia library bugs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
