https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150446
Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #6) > These are my personal opinions: > The feature "gutter" is immature and especially for position "top" it is > half-baked. > > As long as there exist no explicit "top" binding and the gutter position > "top" is not part of the page style, the position "top" should be moved to > "Expert Configuration" and Options > Writer > Compatibility. We may run into a chicken-egg situation by moving important but not fully working content into the expert configuration. An alternative could be to just disable the option in the UI and/or to show some info text (as commented below...). > In case it is > on there, the gutter position selection in the page style dialog should be > disabled with an additional info text, that general gutter position is "top" > for this document by compatibility settings and that such setting is only > useful in docx format. > And in case of "mirrored" page layout we should follow Word and disable the > position selection. We could display "inner" as gutter position. At least we > should disable position "top" in case of "mirrored" page layout. That is no > restriction for docx import/export as the combination of "top" gutter > position with "mirrored" page layout is not possible in Word. Sounds like low hanging fruit. Miklos is (among many other things) expert for the gutter. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
