https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153888
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to wtambellini from comment #9) > Tks for the reply Stuart. Don't thank Stuart - he is gaslighting you. It has already been demonstrated to Stuart that LO _is_ a PDF editor, with his arguments to the contrary refuted. In short: LibreOffice can open/import PDF files, let the user make changes to their contents, and save/export PDF files - just like it can do with DOCX files for example. The difference is that the importation is not very good, and improving it requires a lot of coding effort and applying heuristics to reconstitute structure which is often lost when creating PDFs. LibreOffice is, in fact, one the most popular PDF editors - as probably millions of people use it to edit PDFs. It's just not a very good PDF editor. It is highly inappropriate that Stuart continues to go around telling people the opposite - effectively trying to suppress bug reports about the aspects of PDF handling. I'm linking to the bug where this discussion was held. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
