https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153919
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|NOTABUG |--- --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) 1. Scaling proportionally by default does not require scaling non-proportionately when using Shift+mouse drag, and certainly not scaling non-proportionately _by default_ when using Shift+mouse drag. 2. I understand this happened by explicit decision. The decision was, IMNSHO, a mistake, and I gave the reasons above. What is the justification for the chosen behavior? It seems to me - reading the linked bug - that the idea was to switch the behaviors between shift and no-shift, and thus supposedly minimize changes, or not reduce the "availability" of non-proportionaly resizing. Am I mistaken? Were alternatives (other than the previous state of affairs) presented, considered and rejected? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
