https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153804
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Regression By| |László Németh Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> --- Bibisected with linux-64-7.4 repo to first bad commit 56e1598c747e5a25d262921bd5fa8dc59ebbd902 which points to a cherrypick of core commit: commit 96a856f87f16cca2e039c973c18d57c8b9dca362 author László Németh <[email protected]> Fri Dec 16 13:20:25 2022 +0100 committer László Németh <[email protected]> Mon Dec 19 07:34:36 2022 +0000 tree ecd09006d34dda3eac54afbb96dea016092d6c25 parent d640bfe7767292c8a89de57d378dd752a8ec8342 tdf#152206 DOCX import: fix mixed first footnote Also the first footnote can be at arbitrary place in footnote.xml. Follow-up to commit 09ae3c01940bbc25ffde51963683b04e3cb4bb6a "tdf#152203 DOCX import: fix mixed footnotes/endnotes". Change-Id: Iab356f7373483d812f0e802a994357fdad831d9d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/144380 László, more footnotes fun. Can you please have a look? Note that before that commit, the footnotes were already bad in a different way: footnote 1 was fine, footnotes 2 to 5 contained the same, repeated text. Correct behaviour can bee seen in 7.3 (I believe, but alidostnuman can correct me if I'm wrong). Fix for bug 76260 introduced regression bug 152203, whose fix had follow-up in bug 152506, whose fix introduced this regression. Bug 153255 remains to be fixed too, which was also introduced by the fix for bug 76260. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
