https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37134
--- Comment #86 from Roland Hughes <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #85) > (In reply to Roland Hughes from comment #84) > > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #83) > > > (In reply to Roland Hughes from comment #82) > > > > ... > > > > 37806 specifically refers to Lotus WordPro tabbed divisions > > > > 38401 specifically refers to Lotus WordPro > > > > 152645 refers to the Lotus Spreadsheet > > > > > > > > None of these are referring to the MDI tabs you/this is referring to. > > > > They've just gotten mushed together. > > > > > > Actually bug 37806 and bug 152645 are both *correctly* here for MDI, bug > > > 38401 was incorrectly dupped here and should have remained on bug 33174. I > > > moved that one back. > > > > 37806 was opened by ***me*** and it was most definitely about Lotus WordPro > > tabbed divisions within a single document. > > > > Nope, from bug 37806 > > "WordPro also had an MDI interface, which LibreOffice desperately needs to > get back to. On the main menu at the top was a "Window" item. All > documents were open within the single instance of WordPro. You switch > documents by pressing ALT-W then, after the window menu appeared, a digit > 1-9. If more than 9 documents were open at one time (not that likely given > the memory of the day) the last entry was "m" for more documents. Pressing > "m" would cause a window with all document names to appear. You scrolled > through the list and hit enter on the one you wanted. This worked in both > Windows and OS/2." > > And that valid facet belongs here with MDI. > > > 152645 is also not covered by this bug. While one could stretch it to an MDI > > interface, it is really "one tab per application" where one tab has a Word > > document, another has a spreadsheet, another has Impress drawing. This bug > > is specifically for one application having one tab per singular document. It > > does not cover a single application having one tab for a spreadsheet, one > > tab for a drawing, one tab for a text document ... > > Maybe, but would be the same dev effort. Remains here for conciseness as the > "doer will decide" the implimentation, devs choice with some UX input to > cover the functional requirements. *Best* to keep it simple > > One enhancement for MDI, one enhancement for Divisions per document. How > multi-modues get mixed into the UI is less of an issue than the framework > needed to handle MDI and to handle per document divisions. ***Yes*** The very first line "Under Lotus WordPro, each document had tabbed document sections with the tabs running down the right side of a document." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
