https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154492
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Documentation |Impress --- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- First - an app bug is never a documentation bug. > Renaming might be an option but it would still be used as a style; Perhaps, but not as presentation styles. Actually, we should probably have a deeper conversation about "not-really-style-styles" we have in all sorts of categories, and whether we need some kind of paradigmatic reform. But that's an aside. > and some people disagree. One person who disagreed did not explain why nor suggest an alternative. What are the other reasons for disagreement? > "Style" is not a protected name and used, for example, for table styles as > well (which are rather templates). That's a bug, actually - bug 151264. We should have proper table styles. But see above. > This terminology is an academic topic for normal users who understand it as a > way to change attributes for the whole document. On the contrary. Users read "presentation styles" and expect styles of presentations; but what they see is something else. And coupled with other bugs like bug 154493, and the lack of important style categories in Impress (bug 152652 and its blockers) - the effective result is that Impress users are altogether deterred from using styles. And that's bad. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
