https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
--- Comment #1 from Markus Mohrhard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 77651 [details] > Test Kit with sample.ods and validation results > > Attached very simple sample document breaks ODF when saved with 1.2 Extended > ODF. > A problem is that the rating of different Validators is not consistent, so > we need an expert. > > Steps how to reproduce [Reproducible] with server installation of "LibO > 4.0.2.2 rc - German UI / German Locale [Build ID: > 4c82dcdd6efcd48b1d8bba66bfe1989deee49c3)]" {tinderbox: @6, pull time > 2013-03-26 12:00(?)} on German WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) with newly created > own user profile > > 1. Open "simpletestcase_odftest.ods" > 2. In Menu 'Tools -> Options -> Load/Save -> General - ODF-Version = 1.2 > Extended' > <ok> > 3. Save document under new name > 4. Validate at <http://odf-validator2.rhcloud.com/odf-validator2/> and > <http://officeshots.org/validators/> > Bug: Several wrong ODF > > I know, we do not promise strict ODF with that setting, but is it really > necessary to break conformity in such a simple document? > > The recognized problems are: > a) tag name "calcext:conditional-formats" is not allowed (Bug 62933) > b) Error: in content.xml: Expecting element table-row, got > conditional-formats a and b are not issues as mentioned in Bug 62933. They result from using ODF 1.2 strict and not ODF 1.2 extended. ODF 1.2 extended will never complain that an unexpected element has been found as long as it is not in one of the predefined namespaces. > c) Error: in styles.xml: Did not expect element header > d) Error: in styles.xml: Element master-page has extra content > Please check if they disappear when explicitly selecting ODF 1.2 extended. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
