https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155154

            Bug ID: 155154
           Summary: Spanish spelling checker fails certain verbs past
                    tense indefinido
           Product: LibreOffice
           Version: 7.3.7.2 release
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Linguistic
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected]

Description:
Spanish spelling checker for Spain es_ES fails certain irregular verbs in the
past tense (called indefinido) for 2nd person singular (tú), 1st person plural
(nosostros) and 2nd person plural (vosostros).

verb caer false negatives: caiste, caimos, caisteis
verb creer false negatives: creiste, creimos, creisteis
verb leer false negatives: leiste, leimos, leisteis
verb oír false negatives: oiste, oimos, oisteis
verb poseer false negatives: poseiste, poseimos, posisteis

For all, the first i is incorrectly written as í in the offered suggestion. So
not only should caiste etc. be considered correct, caíste etc. should be
considered as incorrect.

This probably affects more verbs and needs to be checked carefully.

This probably affects also Spanish for other countries, not only Spain.

The same occurs with the dictionary shipped in Ubuntu package hunspell-es
version 1:7.2.0-2.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Spanish spelling checker
2. Write the mentioned verbs in a document
3. Check spelling for Spain (es_ES)

Actual Results:
caiste is marked as incorretly spelled and caíste is given as suggestion

Expected Results:
caiste is marked as correctly spelled and caíste should be marked as incorrect
with suggestion caiste


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
Contact me if more information is needed. To fix this, this report needs to go
to the maintainer of the files es_ES.aff and es_ES.dic

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to