https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33813

[email protected] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTOURBUG

--- Comment #5 from [email protected] ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The difference seems to be in the presentation:preset-id. I don't know whose
> at fault here, but LibO's "ooo-motionpath-right" sounds just as application
> specific as MS's "63". Doesn't the specification prescribe standard preset
> of commonly used animation effects? Moving an object in a straight line
> across a page would seem to be pretty basic?
>
The one determining difference is the first child element of the

 <anim:seq presentation:node-type="main-sequence">

element - for the MSO2k7 file, this is

 <anim:par smil:begin="indefinite">

, for the LibO file, it is

 <anim:par smil:begin="next">

(modifying the MSO file by replacing "indefinite" with "next" makes it
work here).

According to

 http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/smil-timing.html#edef-seq

, disallowed values for children of seq containers are

 syncbase-value | event-value | media-marker-value |
 wallclock-sync-value | repeat-value | accesskey-value | "indefinite"

, such that the attached file AnimOff07.odp is in fact in violation of
the spec.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to