https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116261
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsUXEval CC| |[email protected], | |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org, | |stephane.guillou@libreoffic | |e.org --- Comment #12 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> --- reproduced in recent master build: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha1+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: f4c24da1e7f11664e0d2f688d2531f068e4a3bc0 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded However, as you assumed correctly, this is due the contents of the cell being understood as a formula ("=" is usually used, but "+" and "-" can also do that). It is true that it is awkward that the formatting can be kept until the "formula" is modified. It is also possible to format a formula starting with "=", but it shouldn't be visible when finished editing because it usually displays the results (or an error). Eike an UX team, kind of related to the confusion in bug 132026 and bug 129369, there's the bigger question: why doesn't a formula that starts with +/- behave more like a formula starting with "=", i.e. either giving the result of the formula or errorring if it's invalid? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
