https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153623
--- Comment #12 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10) > > > Can't we use the PS attributes in CS - and solve bug 155113 en passant? > > I don't quite understand this. > > We use default values like Liberation Serif for the font but since CS takes > the attributes from the PS using those could solve many problems. The > drawback is of course that you cannot trust in a particular attribute since > Serif could be Sans on other paragraphs. We use defaults from the document. What you suggest is to change the defaults source - using *some* paragraph properties - which? selected? but what if you have multiple paragraphs selected? And note, that a given character style may be applied not only atop of a "clean" paragraph, but also on top of some character direct formatting, or even on top of another character style (see bug 115311 for discussion of a basically missing UI for that, but still there is a Shift-DoubleClick method). So - I don't see how choosing one default or another could solve anything at all, when the fact is: when you define a character style, any property that you do *not* define directly in the style or one of its ancestors is *undefined*, and the actual value used by a text to which this character style is applied will depend on *other* factors, so not possible to see here in the style dialog. > But the mentioned bug 155113 requires exactly this, to explicitly set > regular font weight for CS to be applied for PS in italic. I do not see how bug 155113 is relevant here at all. They do *not* require there *anything* related to how unset properties are displayed in the style. What they request there is a way to set the Regular as "not Italic, nor Bold" in a style explicitly. Completely unrelated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
