https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154996
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 | |5501 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- I don't object to instructions for locating things on the Tabbed UI to be part of the help pages; but - certainly not as the default. Please see the (long) discussion in bug 135501 about that. Also, recalling that the Tabbed UI has numerous outstanding issues, it does not make sense to promote its use more than the use of, say, toolbars. So, the order of items IMO should be: * menus * toolbars * tabbed UI * keyboard shortcut or * menus * toolbars * keyboard shortcut * tabbed UI Also, (In reply to John Mills from comment #3) > I would personally say yes to this request for usability purposes, a prompt > to ensure that the Tabbed UI is not a "second class" UI in LibreOffice But it is a second-class UI, in two senses: It is inferior usability-wise, even when fully implemented; and it is currently not fully/properly implemented relative to the menus and toolbars. (Like how it is completely unusable for RTL language speakers who need Calc.) > and > considered for documentation is clearly beneficial for those that use this > type of UI. This would ensure that thought is given to both UI interfaces. This I agree with. > This is correct of course but not an ideal > situation where it is the only UI that is given consideration for > documentation. The ideal situation is when tabbed UI is relegated to an extension and removed from the main codebase. It's only because of MSO's poor UI choice that supporting it to this level has any legitimacy, as far as I am concerned. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
