https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153137
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to ady from comment #4) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2) > > recovery should simply not try to recover files that were open in > > read-only mode. Because it means there was no possible unsaved changes that > > need recovery. > > What happens if a user initially opens in read-only mode but then activates > edition? The file was originally opened as read-only, but it is editable by > the time a crash happens. Should recovery be attempted on such file? Not "files that had been *opened* in read-only mode", but "files that were in read-only mode at the moment of crash". Basically - the fact of becoming read-only (even from an initially editable state) should remove the file from the set of files tracked for recovery. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
