https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155786
--- Comment #24 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #23) > (In reply to zuebgirl from comment #22) > > ...No one has still suggested removal, but suggesting that further > > additions to > > these technologies are unofficial and not recommended. Like they do in any > > other project when they think something is not worth supporting anymore. > > You indicated in your initial description: > "Therefore I think it could make sense to discard all the other languages > and allow only JavaScript via QuickJS and use this initiative to" > > so you wanted clearly to keep only Javascript and remove all the other > languages. > > Python is largely used so I don't understand why we would stop supporting it. > VB is still the macro language for Microsoft so we can't stop supporting it. > For the moment, only you consider it's not worth supporting these languages. Well, surely it depends on how one wants to view it. I thought LO seemed like a project that has just enough scope for such trials, but not too much (not like Autodesk -scale). However, we may also see how e.g. Autodesk uses JS: https://help.autodesk.com/view/OARX/2023/ENU/?guid=adsk_jsdev_autocad_javascript_api_about -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
