https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #9 from خالد حسني <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #8) > ------------- > | l | | > | abcd | abcd | > ------------- > > ------------- > | l | abcd | > | abcd | | > ------------- > > I claim that even with _top_ alignment - the user would expect the first > option. Why? Because the _mean_lines_ [1] are aligned - the top of the main > part of the glyphs. Ascenders are extra; somewhat ornamental. It's the > "meat" of the text that needs to be aligned. In your first option the text is bottom aligned not top aligned. It is easy to test what users expect by checking multi-line cells, where the expectation is definitely that the top of the lines is aligned with top alignment and the bottoms with bottom alignment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
